Betekenis van:
cmb

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. A fine of ECU 9,6 million was imposed on CMB.
2. Account was also taken of the fact that the President and secretary of Cewal were staff members of CMB and Cewal had its office in the same premises as CMB.
3. CMB, CMBT and a second company that had been fined, Dafra-Lines A/S, appealed the CFI judgment.
4. Joined cases T-24/93, T-25/93, T-26/93 and T-28/93, CMB, CMBT and Dafra-Lines v Commission, [1996] ECR II-1201.
5. Joined cases C-395/96 P and C-396/96 P, CMB, CMBT and Dafra-Lines v Commission, [2000] ECR I-1365.
6. On 30 April 2004, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty, imposing a fine of EUR 3400000 on the Antwerp shipping company Compagnie Maritime Belge SA (hereinafter CMB).
7. On 16 April 2003 the Commission sent CMB a new statement of objections informing them that it intended to adopt a new decision imposing fines for the infringements established in the original decision.
8. The Commission considers it necessary to impose a fine pursuant to Article 19(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 [6] on CMB for the infringements of Article 82 of the EC Treaty established in the original Decision.
9. In its judgment the CFI held that for reasons of deterrence, the Commission was lawfully entitled to take account of the fact that vessels belonging to the CMB group carried, at the time when the original decision was adopted, almost all the cargoes of the conference.
10. As regards the legal assessment of the situation regarding the fines the position is taken that CMB has been enabled to put forward a proper defence with respect to the fine to be imposed on it and the elements substantiating the fine.
11. The infringements of Article 82 of the EC Treaty committed by CMB and the other members of Cewal are of a serious nature, in as much as they enabled Cewal to maintain a virtual monopoly on its routes to and from Zaire.
12. In the statement of objections the Commission made CMB explicitly aware that it intended to impose fines on it individually, and that the amount of the fine imposed would be fixed in accordance with an assessment of the participation of each company in the conduct constituting the infringement.
13. On 30 April 2004, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty, imposing a fine of EUR 3400000 on the Antwerp shipping company Compagnie Maritime Belge SA (hereinafter CMB). In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [1], the Commission herewith publishes the name of the party and the main content of the decision, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business interests.