Betekenis van:
gravity fault

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. "DBRN" systems designed to navigate underwater using sonar or gravity databases that provide a positioning accuracy equal to or less (better) than 0,4 nautical miles; b. "development""technology", as follows, for "active flight control systems" (including fly-by-wire or fly-by-light): 1. configuration design for interconnecting multiple microelectronic processing elements (on-board computers) to achieve "real time processing" for control law implementation; 2. control law compensation for sensor location or dynamic airframe loads, i.e., compensation for sensor vibration environment or for variation of sensor location from the centre of gravity; 3. electronic management of data redundancy or systems redundancy for fault detection, fault tolerance, fault isolation or reconfiguration; Note:7E004.b.3. does not control "technology" for the design of physical redundancy. 4. flight controls which permit inflight reconfiguration of force and moment controls for real time autonomous air vehicle control; 5. integration of digital flight control, navigation and propulsion control data into a digital flight management system for "total control of flight"; Note:7E004.b.5. does not control: a. "development""technology" for integration of digital flight control, navigation and propulsion control data into a digital flight management system for "flight path optimisation"; b. "development""technology" for "aircraft" flight instrument systems integrated solely for VOR, DME, ILS or MLS navigation or approaches. 6. full authority digital flight control or multisensor mission management systems employing "expert systems"; N.B.:for "technology" for Full Authority Digital Engine Control ("FADEC"), see 9E003.a.9. c. "technology" for the "development" of helicopter systems, as follows: 1. multi-axis fly-by-wire or fly-by-light controllers which combine the functions of at least two of the following into one controlling element: a. collective controls;
2. Council of State, 16 November 1998, Sille: ‘First, having regard to the fact, as the judges in the court of first instance decided, whether the public authorities can be held liable, even without fault, on the grounds of the principle of the equality of citizens before public burdens, where a measure lawfully adopted has the effect of causing a special loss of a certain degree of gravity to a natural or legal person, that does not hold true in this case because Mr Sille, in his capacity as a real-estate professional, could not be unaware of the risks necessarily involved in the execution of a building project such as that planned in this case, in respect of which it was necessary, in particular, to amend the provisions of the land-use plan and obtain the agreement of the local council that Mr Sille should have contemplated the possibility or, faced with the negative findings of the public enquiry and the hostility encountered by the project, that it would be dropped by the local authority; that having taken on the risk in full knowledge of the facts, he cannot usefully maintain that he has suffered an abnormal loss and that the local authority must bear the substantial consequences for him arising from the shelving of the project’.