Betekenis van:
redetermination

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. Infineon substantially agrees with the redetermination.
2. Infineon substantially agrees with the redetermination. However, it submits that the Commission should impose a higher duty based on a proxy benchmark and the original injury determination, rather than the lower duty set out in this Regulation.
3. Finally, the GOK submits that the Commission’s injury redetermination does not separate and distinguish the effects of other known factors, particularly with respect to economic downturn, overcapacity and other non-subsidised imports.
4. Micron also substantially agrees with the redetermination, referring in this respect to facts and evidence that tend to confirm and corroborate the Commission’s conclusions, including an expert report prepared by Professor J. Hausman.
5. The Commission is also of the view that its redetermination satisfies the non-attribution requirement in respect of declines in the level of demand by showing that during the period under consideration no such demand declines took place.
6. Accordingly, the Commission is of the view that its redetermination satisfies the non-attribution requirement under Article 8(7) of the basic Regulation (which generally corresponds to Article 15.5 of the SCM Agreement) in respect of demand growth by showing that, during the period under consideration, trends in demand growth were independent from trends in the sales prices of the Community industry.
7. In making this redetermination, the Commission has based its calculation of subsidy on a ‘benefit to the recipient’ and not on a ‘cost to the government’ standard, as is required by Article 6 of the basic Regulation, consistent with the Panel's reasoning, with the determinations in the definitive Regulation and with the Commission's established practice [32].
8. Therefore, the Commission is of the view that its redetermination satisfies the non-attribution requirement under Article 8(7) of the basic Regulation (which generally corresponds to Article 15.5 of the SCM Agreement) in respect of non-subject imports by separating and distinguishing this other factor from subsidised imports and showing that, during the period under consideration, non-subject imports did not cause material injury to the Community industry, either in terms of their volume effects or in terms of their price effects.