Betekenis van:
retrial

retrial
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • herziening van een vonnis door de Hoge Raad
  • a new trial in which issues already litigated and to which the court has already rendered a verdict or decision are reexamined by the same court; occurs when the initial trial is found to have been improper or unfair due to procedural errors

Hyperoniemen


Voorbeeldzinnen

  1. the person did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame. 4.
  2. The retrial or appeal shall begin within due time after the surrender.’;
  3. the person did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame;
  4. the person did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame.
  5. did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame.’;
  6. did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame;
  7. Implement legal provisions on the right to retrial in line with the relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
  8. will be informed of the time frame within which he or she has to request such a retrial or appeal, as mentioned in the relevant European arrest warrant.
  9. In case a person is surrendered under the conditions of paragraph (1)(d) and he or she has requested a retrial or appeal, the detention of that person awaiting such retrial or appeal shall, until these proceedings are finalised, be reviewed in accordance with the law of the issuing Member State, either on a regular basis or upon request of the person concerned.
  10. the person will be informed of the time frame within which he or she has to request a retrial or appeal, which will be … days.
  11. amend the criminal procedure Code so as to enforce the right to retrial in line with the relevant judgments of the ECtHR.
  12. On 17 May 2004 the Italian Court of Appeal cancelled the sentence and ordered a retrial.’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by the following:
  13. Therefore, provisions such as those relating to the right to a retrial have a scope which is limited to the definition of these grounds for non-recognition.
  14. Therefore, provisions such as those relating to the right to a retrial have a scope which is limited to the definition of these grounds for non-recognition. They are not designed to harmonise national legislation.
  15. The provision of the judgment to the person concerned is for information purposes only; it shall neither be regarded as a formal service of the judgment nor actuate any time limits applicable for requesting a retrial or appeal.