Betekenis van:
ship building

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. According to the shipbuilding framework, ‘shipbuilding’ means the building in the Community of self-propelled seagoing commercial vessels and ‘ship repair’ the repair or reconditioning in the Community of such vessels.
2. As regards the Commission's doubts about Ancona's previous experience in building ships of similar complexity, Italy considers that it had gained such experience with the construction and outfitting of around half of the Disney Magic and with the passenger ship Danielle Casanova.
3. A 100 % owned subsidiary of IRISL. It conducts transfers between Iran and the Gulf States such as Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Valfajr is a Dubai-based subsidiary of Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) that provides ferry and feeder services, and sometimes couriers freight and passengers across the Persian Gulf. Valfajr in Dubai booked ship crews, booked supply vessel services, prepared ships for arrival and departure and for loading and unloading in port. Valfajr has port calls in the Persian Gulf and India. As of mid-June 2009, Valfajr shared the same building with IRISL in Port Rashid in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and also shared the same building with IRISL in Tehran, Iran.
4. In support of their case, they supplied new information supporting their opinion that the above events affected the building of the vessel in the form of copies of the contracts between the shipowner Marnavi and Novamar, a charter company based in Houston (US), for the chartering of two chemical tankers ordered by the shipowner from Cantieri Navali Termoli and the revoking of the contracts by Novamar in the wake of the events of 11 September 2001. The Italian authorities thus maintain that these tragic events had a similar effect on the ship in question, and that contrary to the Commission’s view, the impact of these events is not confined to cruise ships.
5. In particular, they support their case by arguing that the Commission’s appraisal was based on a report drawn up in the autumn of 2003 i.e. two years after the events, whereas these events had an impact on the commercial strategies of economic operators who had to take decisions at the time the events occurred, i.e. in September 2001 or the months immediately after. According to the Italian authorities, it was generally known and further confirmed by the Clarkson reports that these events had an impact on the entire maritime goods transportation market, and not just on one type of vessel, i.e. cruise ships. In support of their case, they supplied new information supporting their opinion that the above events affected the building of the vessel in the form of copies of the contracts between the shipowner Marnavi and Novamar, a charter company based in Houston (US), for the chartering of two chemical tankers ordered by the shipowner from Cantieri Navali Termoli and the revoking of the contracts by Novamar in the wake of the events of 11 September 2001. The Italian authorities thus maintain that these tragic events had a similar effect on the ship in question, and that contrary to the Commission’s view, the impact of these events is not confined to cruise ships.