Betekenis van:
spider crab

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. Edible crab and spider crab
2. Spinous spider crab
3. C edible crab and spider crab
4. Carcinus aestuarii Spinous spider crab
5. Carcinus aestuarii Spinous spider crab SCR Maja squinado
6. The Commission will analyse the arguments concerning three species cited by France: Norway lobster, monkfish and spider crab.
7. The Commission has no data concerning the quantities withdrawn of spider crab, the third species cited by France [9].
8. So consumers did not shun the Cancer pagurus crab in the early months of 2000, and nothing indicates that things were any different for the spider crab over the same period.
9. And, according to Ofimer’s sectoral report for January-April 2000, withdrawals remained below 1,5 % of the quantities landed of the main species; individual withdrawals were reported for sea bass, anchovy and spider crab.
10. It went on: ‘the level of withdrawals showed some very sharp peaks for species such as Norway lobster (175 %), monkfish (161 %) and spider crab (X 5) whose sensitivity to residual hydrocarbons [6] was highly publicised.’
11. For some species the level of withdrawals was extremely high (Norway lobsters: + 175 %, monkfish: + 161 %, spider crab: × 5), which is evidence of the psychological impact of the oil pollution on consumer behaviour.
12. Average price falls for some of these species were: sole (– 5 %), sea bass (– 6 %), hake (– 6 %), anchovy (– 6 %), squid (– 11 %), saithe (– 8 %), sardine (– 6 %), John Dory (– 11 %), mackerel (– 18 %), plaice (– 28 %), black scabbard-fish (– 20 %), black sea bream (– 11 %), red gurnard (– 4 %), octopus (– 23 %), spider crab (– 16 %), pink shrimp (– 20 %).
13. The spider crab is one of the species referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 3759/92 but is not listed in Annex 1 A, D or E. If a withdrawal price is set by the producers’ organisation for such a species they are not obliged to send the withdrawal figures to the Commission.
14. So consumers did not shun the Cancer pagurus crab in the early months of 2000, and nothing indicates that things were any different for the spider crab over the same period. (92) Therefore, although withdrawals in January 2000 rose by 92 % compared with January 1999 and rose by 28 % over the first half of that year, these withdrawals were not large in absolute terms. Nor is there any evidence to link this increase to the media coverage of the oil spill. Furthermore, the figures available to the Commission show that the large withdrawals recorded in January 2000 were of species such as spotted dogfish (from 11423 to 16362 kg), saithe (from 120 to 3727 kg) and plaice (from 51 to 1789 kg), species for which, given the way they are marketed, there is little or no link between increased withdrawals and the media coverage of the oil spill. And, according to Ofimer’s sectoral report for January-April 2000, withdrawals remained below 1,5 % of the quantities landed of the main species; individual withdrawals were reported for sea bass, anchovy and spider crab.